@RichmondDoc all people we pay attention to in the argument are professionals in their fields how is the layman supposed to differentiate?
@fragpasty @RichmondDoc I can tell you now, my family & I get excellent service from NHS, since I made a point of learning all about consent
-
-
@C7RKY@RichmondDoc don't see why NHS docs get upset when questioned. The good ones don't. -
@fragpasty@richmonddoc Really good ones have changed their mind, when presented with evidence which contradicts the info they've been fed. -
@C7RKY@fragpasty Agree with all your comments about choice, pt empowerment, pt engagement, etc. also agree many docs easily influenced. -
@RichmondDoc@fragpasty 'Easily influenced'? Hope that's not back-handed swipe at those still open-minded enough to question? That's science -
@C7RKY Actually, was referring to the influence and effectiveness of the pharmaceutical industry in the US. -
@RichmondDoc So you recognise this, but still quote US evidence at me as 'proof' of safety? Yeah...I'll stick to thinking for myself thanks. -
@C7RKY if the only evidence we had for vaccine safety was from Phrma it would be different. Research on safety done independently. -
@RichmondDoc I'd follow that pharma money a little closer if I were you Doc... it gets into all sorts of places you wouldn't imagine...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.