Interesting that some people believe everyone is deliberately fiddling mortality stats. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/mar/16/fiddle-nhs-figures-criminal … lots just getting it wrong
@mulberrybush To be honest, I'm appalled that this wasn't done right from the outset. Not like it isn't kind of important or anything... :-/
-
-
@C7RKY My view of the history of this is that it was not a clear decision > more a slow insinuation. A bit like grandmothers footsteps!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY the systems were around from about 2001 -several of them- This one captured press support in 2007 & bounced its way to front runnerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY I think that it was the concerns about how robust the system actually is (in practice rather than theory) which led SHA to do reseach -
@mulberrybush The v 1st time a single doc got a high death rate through wrong coding, a manager should have picked that problem up & issued> -
@C7RKY I think that you would find that in this case there was no coding manager in place & CEO was gone, awaiting replacement. -
@mulberrybush Forget coding manager for a min - even if ALL the codes were wrong, I'd expect somebody senior to be asking why pretty quickly -
@C7RKY I watched the way people talked about this issue at the PI. > suspect few really understood. Ever after 5 years being aware of this>
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.