That's what their org.s do. There is very little evidence of lots of whistleblowers being bought off
-
-
Replying to @BenClover
@BenClover If no-one looks then they will not see. We know that there are hundreds of these agreements. Each one a tip of a massive iceberg2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatientsFirstUK
@PatientsFirstUK Now is obviously an expensive way to do hirings/firings at senior level but that is most of what it is, not a mass cover-up2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenClover
@BenClover there are a small number with ambiguous clauses Will write to people concerned to reassure them. Most clauses protect employee!1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ruthcarnall
@ruthcarnall@benclover this is such an annoying statement. Gagging staff is rife in the NHS at all levels. An entrenched culture.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @drkimholt
@drkimholt@benclover may be annoying but if every attempt to do better on this diff topic is just rubbished people will not try.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ruthcarnall
@ruthcarnall@benclover Simply stop the flow of NHS money to these payments unless you have seen the compromise agreement & individual.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drkimholt
@drkimholt@benclover we do now see all senior ones but not from FTs and the agreement but does not reveal human story I accept2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ruthcarnall @drkimholt @benclover That's a big point Ruth. Underlying story is rarely reflected in documentation - the lawyers see to that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.