Calls in papers this am for David Nicholson to go both wrong and not in the interests of patients or the NHS.
-
-
Replying to @SirJohnOldham
@SirJohnOldham@KayFSheldon John, I have to disagree. There’s evidence Mid Staffs was not ‘singular’ and not the attitude needed in a leader7 replies 8 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Jarmann
@Jarmann@sirjohnoldham@kayfsheldon I could not agree with you more Brian..as I said in my letter to the telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/letters/9858697/The-deadly-gulf-between-NHS-managers-and-the-reality-of-patient-care.html …1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesTitcombe
@JamesTitcombe@SirJohnOldham@KayFSheldon If thorough investigations are done of the 14 trusts with high HSMRs we will see if MS ‘singular’2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jarmann
@Jarmann@JamesTitcombe@SirJohnOldham Vital of course that investigations are robust and entirely independent of the DH. Sad no HCC team2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @heatherawwood
@heatherawwood@Jarmann@JamesTitcombe@SirJohnOldham If investigations were robust & independent, we'd already know MidStaffs isn't unique.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@jarmann@jamestitcombe CQC investigations lightweight; don't look at role of commissioners & NHS hierarchy as not keen to challenge1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@heatherawwood @jarmann @jamestitcombe Yes, I'm sorry to say I'd got that impression too, from the woefully inadequate response I received.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.