@Jarmann @rivkahmiar @curethenhs This is essentially a medical intervention without consent, albeit using inactive nature to justify. Wrong!
@JFr4ser @katemasters67 @jarmann @rivkahmiar @curethenhs It's a mess. And a purposeful one for protection reasons imho. Needs radical change
-
-
@C7RKY@katemasters67@jarmann@rivkahmiar@curethenhs Dont think the prob is interaction between pt & HCP but individual vs collective need -
@JFr4ser@katemasters67@jarmann@rivkahmiar@curethenhs Not sure I understand. What is 'collective need'? Does it conflict with individual? -
@C7RKY@katemasters67@jarmann@rivkahmiar@curethenhs < ratio and less senior drs on less numbers but you're not fully stable. -
@JFr4ser@katemasters67@jarmann@rivkahmiar@curethenhs So simply put, this is conflict between safety & hitting targets. Targets win! -
@C7RKY@katemasters67@jarmann@rivkahmiar@curethenhs < other ones. None I've worked in anyway. -
@JFr4ser Don't pretend to understand all factors, but it feels to me like clinical opinion is being placed under pressure to bend by targets -
@C7RKY < you might be delayed getting ultrasound to confirm or ERCP to remove. -
@JFr4ser then we should fund all life-threatening requirements. Not interested in pretty charts saying 4hr target met if patient died later! - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.