@faithshattered @gmcuk @C7RKY @Jarmann I am at the Information Commissioners Office to force the GMC to reveal their external barrister, WHY
-
-
Replying to @Miguelcubells
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Any theories? What conflict of interests might be at play?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann I can't see any conflicts of interest. What reason would a State agency have not to reveal barrister1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Miguelcubells
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann You've got to assume there's SOMETHING they'd rather you didn't know. Why withold otherwise?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann I wonder if it is Kirsty :-) Only joking Kirst. Pos the barrister is embaraced at the their work?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Miguelcubells
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Saw you getting cheeky with Kirsty - steady now! :) So you think guilt by GMC association?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Think I was a bit too cheeky. Think Kirsty was cross ;-) No barrister emabaraced by his/her own work.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Miguelcubells
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Certainly not that they'd ever admit to anyway. I'd be less sure now.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann The GMC Rule 4 decision was that bad that the barrister spelt the doctors name wrong. Correct Dr ??1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Miguelcubells @faithshattered @gmcuk @Jarmann Such 'acceptable errors' lead to just that sort of doubt, where clarity should be, I'd say M.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.