@faithshattered @gmcuk @C7RKY @Jarmann I am at the Information Commissioners Office to force the GMC to reveal their external barrister, WHY
@Miguelcubells @faithshattered @gmcuk @Jarmann You've got to assume there's SOMETHING they'd rather you didn't know. Why withold otherwise?
-
-
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann I wonder if it is Kirsty :-) Only joking Kirst. Pos the barrister is embaraced at the their work? -
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Saw you getting cheeky with Kirsty - steady now! :) So you think guilt by GMC association? -
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Think I was a bit too cheeky. Think Kirsty was cross ;-) No barrister emabaraced by his/her own work. -
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Certainly not that they'd ever admit to anyway. I'd be less sure now. -
@C7RKY@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann The GMC Rule 4 decision was that bad that the barrister spelt the doctors name wrong. Correct Dr ?? -
@Miguelcubells@faithshattered@gmcuk@Jarmann Such 'acceptable errors' lead to just that sort of doubt, where clarity should be, I'd say M.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.