@Miguelcubells @JamesTitcombe @Jarmann Were you given an 'explanation'?
@Miguelcubells @KayFSheldon @JamesTitcombe @Jarmann Yes, but CPS about to be given power to take over private cases 'not in public interest'
-
-
@C7RKY@KayFSheldon@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann What they really mean is that it's not in the States interest to prosecute themselves. -
@Miguelcubells@KayFSheldon@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann Or makes sure nobody in the club can get caught out. And the protection ring closes... -
@C7RKY@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann John, it's what you call introduction of a Police State via stealth. Have court case in March = secret annex! -
@Miguelcubells@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann What the hell's a 'secret annex' when it's at home? From my perspective, secret anything is bad news! -
@C7RKY@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann John, I have a case against the ICO & cops in March. The Court/Cops/ICO have secret document I cant see. -
@Miguelcubells@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann Well how ironic. A secret document you can't see in a case against the ICO? You couldn't write it eh? -
@C7RKY@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann@KayFSheldon Well spotted, the originator of the secret information is the Information Commissioner himself. -
@Miguelcubells@JamesTitcombe@Jarmann@KayFSheldon Oh it just gets better....Is your case to demand it's handed over? - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.