@marklewislawyer @jay_ramella @c7rky @telegraph we'd b better of seeking universal & uniform solutions that apply to press & online.
-
-
Replying to @UnitaryPatent
@UnitaryPatent @marklewislawyer@jay_ramella@telegraph Why? So they can impose publishing law on twitter & bloggers to shut them up? Worse!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @marklewislawyer@jay_ramella@telegraph publishing laws DO apply to online. It's just that they are ill suited for both online&print1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UnitaryPatent
@UnitaryPatent @marklewislawyer@jay_ramella@telegraph No expert, but surely newspaper-type legals would kill mass tweeting if enforced?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @marklewislawyer@jay_ramella point as b to prevent or remedy "harm" that is outlawed. Doesn't matter where it's published/broadcast.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UnitaryPatent
@UnitaryPatent @marklewislawyer@jay_ramella Ok, won't argue law with a lawyer. Other than law of (un)intended consequences p'haps? Silence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@UnitaryPatent@Jay_Ramella hope u didn't see it as arguing. it is just opinion and might not be right. keep well2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkLewisLawyer @unitarypatent @jay_ramella Sorry, bad choice of words Mark. Just trying to understand much that makes no sense to me. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.