@mily_uk as there is no conviction it is just rumour and supposition so the man is innocent and has the right to sue
@rjward2009 I think you may be confusing who is the defendant in this case. Burden of proof would've been on McA vs BBC not other way round!
-
-
@C7RKY no the bbc in the case defamed Mc A so burden of proof would be on bbc -
@rjward2009 What!? I suggest you read your last tweet again and delete it before attending any more paralegal conferences!#embarrassing -
@C7RKY no need to delete the fact the bbc collapsed and paid out proved they had no evidence or they would have defended it in court -
@rjward2009 And there it is... DEFENDED it. Remind me again where the burden of proof lies!? Who had to prove who guilty? Where is burden? -
@C7RKY well if you make a accusation its upto you to prove what you say is true bbc failed or rather where "unwilling" to do that
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY to prve they were right to defameThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY and what they were saying was true, which they could not do or their own legal team would have defendedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.