An evidence based profession making sweeping statements and dangerous assumptions based on little evidence. Very worrying.
-
-
Replying to @katemasters67 @Cjw450Cathy and
Very, I agree. Has far broader implications for confidence in the medical profession, imho.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @katemasters67 and
You haven’t even finished reading the transcripts (and do you even have any of the other relevant reports such as SUI and coroners reports) and you‘re throwing accusations re: ‘evidence-based‘ and implications for medical practice around?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @C7RKY and
That‘s direct evidence of pre-exeisting bias. You‘ve made up your mind & are now trawling court transcripts for ‘evidence’ to support your argument...that‘s called positive bias, and is dangerous. I don’t give a rodent’s derrière what you come up with now.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @C7RKY and
@C7RKY , you’re neither external nor impartial. Clearly state your COI or your opinions about the court transcripts are little more than popularism and fake news.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @C7RKY and
Better put me in that pot too Cathy, I’m reading them and they are, as expected, illuminating.
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67 @C7RKY and
goes for anyone who‘ll commentate on them, until people can read them for themselves. But, where there‘s any heated debate there are sides, hidden prejudices & biases. In any discussion, when only 1 side has information being discussed ‘evidence’ is always open to manipulation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @katemasters67 and
That's what people felt about the Panorama programme.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @LostTransport @katemasters67 and
Yes, exactly. But I suspect there was a lot more in that programme not mentioned, to benefit and detriment of both sides of the argument.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @LostTransport and
One thing that sticks with me is this massive call by docs on SocMed about being able to reflect to improve and Dr BG’s straight out ‘I am not a criminal’ This shows no reflection (and a lack of respect for the rule of law)
3 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
And Deb Cohen just allowed her to say it without question. Watch that moment back - couldn't decide if I was more surprised by the lack of challenge, or the facial expression at the start of the reply.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.