Yes I know, I have followed since the inquest - the DNR issue caught my attention. Jack died just after my mum, my dad ‘sued’ the NHS over mum’s DNR, in the process of dad’s case I found people with LD’s often have DNR issues. Not much from doctors until Dr BG struck off. Why?
-
-
Replying to @katemasters67 @Cjw450Cathy and
Well if they think that 21 mistakes is acceptable then I think they all need to look at a new profession. It’s an absolute disgrace. What makes us so mad is the fact none of them sat in court for 4.5 wks & listened to any evidence but there quick enough to have an opinion.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @VictorAdcock2 @katemasters67 and
None of them CAN see evidence you saw presented. Nor can we (or you) see the evidence that was NOT presented. Where is the discussion about why those mistakes happened? Where is discussion re: whether Dr BG was suitably qualified for that role on that day? Or who decided that?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @VictorAdcock2 and
Is the place for that discussion nearly 8 years down the line?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67 @VictorAdcock2 and
Is it OK to avoid important discussions just because 8 years have gone by?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @katemasters67 and
No. But it's worthy of note that despite not having been able to see all the evidence and despite such discussions not having been instigated, (let alone exhausted), it didn't prevent a crowd funding appeal being launched to try and protect the career of a convicted criminal.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @Cjw450Cathy and
An evidence based profession making sweeping statements and dangerous assumptions based on little evidence. Very worrying.
2 replies 4 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67 @Cjw450Cathy and
Very, I agree. Has far broader implications for confidence in the medical profession, imho.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @katemasters67 and
You haven’t even finished reading the transcripts (and do you even have any of the other relevant reports such as SUI and coroners reports) and you‘re throwing accusations re: ‘evidence-based‘ and implications for medical practice around?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cjw450Cathy @C7RKY and
That‘s direct evidence of pre-exeisting bias. You‘ve made up your mind & are now trawling court transcripts for ‘evidence’ to support your argument...that‘s called positive bias, and is dangerous. I don’t give a rodent’s derrière what you come up with now.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh sod off Cathy. I'm not in the mood.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.