They don’t care though. #PHSO have the opportunity to uphold human rights but choose not to.
So why would their own standard of practice differ to those they train and defend?
-
-
Agreed re individual prosecutions, but I favour sticking to the terminology of gross negligence manslaughter. That of course includes reckless acts, but also incorporates important concepts such as omission/indifference. However, NOT wilfulness. That's murder, not manslaughter!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Such debates are how lawyers make money, but for what it's worth, I think an intentional omission which would knowingly result in death would likely still qualify as murder. I've no doubt that can be debated to within an inch of its life though!
-
It was accepted by medical experts, one who was said to be a world leader in paediatric endocrinolgy, that 5 of the doctors in Robbie's care were grossly negligent & had be a significant cause of his death. They all evaded prosecution which is currently under review by DPP! :(
-
Doesn't matter what the law says when so many contrive to subvert it, eh? Despicable cover up.
-
Grossly unfair to families. Individuals should be accountable. BUT real change will come when managers are held accountable, too. Where managers fail to provide adequate resources for DRs and nurses to do their jobs. (that is shockingly often!)
-
Absolutely agree. Management are the key untouchables in all this & that must change. Where provision of inadequate resources is a significant causative factor, the trust should be prosecuted, imho. Current GNM law even allows for consideration of 'all the circumstances' re HCPs.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
