That a good point I’d not thought of before. Semantics are important. What would be a collective term for us all?
-
-
This gaming still occurs in Scotland with adverse event figures. Can you believe that one health board recorded ZERO adverse events after being previously investigated and told that 19 per year was artificially low. This went undiscovered as there's no independant regulator!
-
'Inspect what you expect'. It's a simple rule. Easy to grasp and applies to all walks of life, but a compulsory component for any profession that wants to refer to itself as 'regulated' with a straight face.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good point. I believe we should audit in detail say 1 in 10 sets of notes of patients who spent at least 5 days as inpatient whether discharged alive or dead and the ‘auditor& should be blind to the outcome. Data should then be reported by Care Team.
-
But the Big Message would still be the same - paper handwritten notes prescription & Clinical monitoring processes and without watertight order Comms are a major daily risk to
#PatientSafety harming those who ‘survive’ and those who die - avoidable or nothttps://www.dropbox.com/s/1p1g0dgxymwea9h/KingsFundMay2017.pdf?dl=0 … -
I don't think you've ever had resistance from me on this one? And I'm not about to start now. Everything about paper-only systems is unfit for purpose in a modern world, with one exception - cover ups. Paper records are really helpful for those with designs on covering things up.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.