Point 3: "We won #Sellu but my view is losing an appeal does not confirm guilt."
What does confirm guilt then? Are you also of the view that winning an appeal does not confirm innocence? Meaning Sellu isn't in the clear? Can't have it both ways, try as you might. Same judge!
6/
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @DrJennyVaughan and
Point 4: "I support proactive patient safety but not the system making scapegoats" You constantly claim
#BawaGarba has been scapegoated but you fail to explain how so many non-NHS parties have colluded to do so or why. Police CPS Coroner Judges Jurors All in on the conspiracy? /71 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrJennyVaughan and
You shamelessly misdirect readers on the facts of this case imho, in order to attempt to influence opinion and gain support for reforms which are designed to secure unjustified extra protections for doctors. I've had enough of it, frankly.
#BawaGarba#BawaGarbage 8/83 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrJennyVaughan and
Dear
@DrJennyVaughan John means well and you or me or even@doctorcaldwell will not change his mind. He cares a lot for#justice but he genuinly believe#BawaGarba conviction was justified. The best thing is to agree to disagree and now focus on the future. What next?@gmcuk2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu @DrJennyVaughan and
Anybody can change my mind if they present me with evidence to demonstrate why I should do so, Umesh. I'm open minded. What I believe is that nobody has put an evidenced argument together which demonstrates that her conviction is unjustified. Despite impressions to the contrary.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu and
I think it’s hard to say that the systemic failings were considered. All you can really say is that the systemic failings presented to, and available to the court, were considered. Not the same thing
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin @DrUmeshPrabhu and
I don't think anyone can say anything for sure without the trial transcript (I'm looking at you again here,
@drcmday). It's important to be clear the jury (not just the court) heard such evidence, but otherwise I wouldn't disagree. Do you think something was left out? Why, if so?5 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY @gourmetpenguin and
System is in the eye of the beholder. Dr BG was part of a training system ? a Deanery and a Royal College: her 5y training (+earlier years) apparently qualified her for nothing. That can't be right. That system needs public exam.
3 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
I take it from your comments that you've worked with Hadiza extensively in acute settings?
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin @rwade300 and
A few armchair lawyers here.Jonathan Cusack, who was the only one there at the both trial & mpts said “expert witnesses were stopped by the prosecution from discussing significant improvements the trust made after the incident highlighting the multifactorial nature of the case. “
6 replies 4 retweets 10 likes
If we're just armchair lawyers, then you should be able to refute our concerns with evidence based facts easily enough. Expert witnesses may have been stopped by the prosecution from covering that ground, but what stopped the defence from having them do it? Selective observation.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @DrJennyVaughan and
ZHH Who were to be the expert witnesses on
#patientsafety ?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @KenZeroHarm @DrJennyVaughan and
At the trial? I've no idea without a transcript. There's mention of a couple of witnesses in the judgements, but I don't know who's missing.
0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.