Point 4: "I support proactive patient safety but not the system making scapegoats"
You constantly claim #BawaGarba has been scapegoated but you fail to explain how so many non-NHS parties have colluded to do so or why.
Police
CPS
Coroner
Judges
Jurors
All in on the conspiracy?
/7
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @DrJennyVaughan and
You shamelessly misdirect readers on the facts of this case imho, in order to attempt to influence opinion and gain support for reforms which are designed to secure unjustified extra protections for doctors. I've had enough of it, frankly.
#BawaGarba#BawaGarbage 8/83 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrJennyVaughan and
Dear
@DrJennyVaughan John means well and you or me or even@doctorcaldwell will not change his mind. He cares a lot for#justice but he genuinly believe#BawaGarba conviction was justified. The best thing is to agree to disagree and now focus on the future. What next?@gmcuk2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu @DrJennyVaughan and
Anybody can change my mind if they present me with evidence to demonstrate why I should do so, Umesh. I'm open minded. What I believe is that nobody has put an evidenced argument together which demonstrates that her conviction is unjustified. Despite impressions to the contrary.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu and
I think it’s hard to say that the systemic failings were considered. All you can really say is that the systemic failings presented to, and available to the court, were considered. Not the same thing
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin @DrUmeshPrabhu and
I don't think anyone can say anything for sure without the trial transcript (I'm looking at you again here,
@drcmday). It's important to be clear the jury (not just the court) heard such evidence, but otherwise I wouldn't disagree. Do you think something was left out? Why, if so?5 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu and
Didn’t talk to any of the trainees on the unit: hard to see how a clear picture of “normal for that unit” could have taken place without that; wider reports into quality of training can much later
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin @DrUmeshPrabhu and
Ok, but if the jury got to hear what 'exceptionally challenging circumstances for that unit' were like on the day in question, then does that not better serve her defence than a more general picture of normality?
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu and
Not sure: things like showing a consultant an abnormal blood result and having that ignored. I learnt pretty quickly that if you challenged that or pushed for a response, you could get taken to pieces. Public humiliation. That’s a cultural issue
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin @C7RKY and
Not calling a consultant if you were worried because you didn’t expect a response or any support
2 replies 3 retweets 3 likes
I must say, that's the one aspect of this sorry tale where I sympathise with her position. Whatever capability is expected of her, it's only fair the consultant demonstrate the same. Looking at the appeal grounds for BG, did he escape because he arrived after point of no return?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.