This study was based on healthy individuals John. Dangerous to advise when you do not know the medical history of the individual.
I think the reason I went looking is far less important in this instance than what I found when I did. And yes I concentrate on the studies. Why wouldn't I? They are the evidence in 'evidence based medicine' after all.
-
-
Because, IMO, the study in question was picked because it confirmed your bias, studies should align with the stats and they do - that’s when we have true EBM. Hence why ppl with health problems are offered the jab and healthy not (Bar front line staff to protect public)
-
Nonsense, Kerrie. I've been making the same point re clinical trials being quackery for years. Partially evidence based. I picked this review (of ALL available studies) because it was the topic under discussion. I've already acknowledged your point about health problems elsewhere
-
Since the scandal where that guy fiddled the trials about vaccines causing autism I don't trust any of that "science". If he could do it anyone can.
-
There's a scandal surrounding the whole matter all right. But there's far more scandal than advertised to discuss on that subject.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxr-cv-JuI8 …
-
It's all made up, I am cured of "science"
-
I'm a massive fan of real science. I just wish we'd try it some time for something other than military progress.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.