-
-
Replying to @alexander_minh @neilgchurchill and
I asked to meet
@NIPSO_Comms Commissioner. When this was written they knew the Indep Prof had given an unauthorised opinion on my diagnosis; contradicted world experts’ advice & contrary to his conclusion a diagnosis had been effectively & thoroughly excluded I had been diagnosedpic.twitter.com/pAuvryiu1y
2 replies 9 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Imonlyslightly @alexander_minh and
Following that I made public I was offering
@NIPSO_Comms evidence from med records their Indep Prof had misquoted findings of reports to form the conclusion on diagnosis. There is much wrong with NIPSO’s report but I focused on misquotation of records- they seem easily confused.pic.twitter.com/G8Nzu6X8sj
1 reply 6 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Imonlyslightly @alexander_minh and
They didn’t ask for the evidence which of course I have. They applied the Unreasonable Behavours Policy. So,
@NIPSO_Comms believe it’s unreasonable to object to misquotation of your med records, including a genetics report, to form a misdiagnosis that is shared in their report.pic.twitter.com/y3r0vIO1Xo
3 replies 10 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Imonlyslightly @robertBird5 and
Same old same old ! After the Inquest into my Mothers Death more questions arose so I wrote to the Chief Executive
@andrewkfoster to get the answers and he chose to delegate it to the Trust Solicitor and refused to answer my questions.2 replies 6 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @davideaton51 @Imonlyslightly and
The above named refused to see my friend with a Solicitor present, but said she could have a meeting with the trust without a Solicitor
If that's not abuse of power i don't know what is!1 reply 8 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ang__johnson @davideaton51 and
The trust insist on dealing with my complaint face to face & not in writing. I did consider turning up with a solicitor in tow, but I anticipated that would happen.
2 replies 6 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @stendec6 @ang__johnson and
I had been communicating with Wigan Infirmary by email for 10 years and because as soon as I received a message I was able to reply straight away said in future I had to correspond using the postal service.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @davideaton51 @stendec6 and
I just don't understand how they think they can dictate on this. The trust which I was scrutinising tried switching to sending letters once they realised I was making progress too quickly via email. I demanded they switch back. They did.pic.twitter.com/PT9S49v9ax
2 replies 4 retweets 1 like -
Me. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.