When the M25 becomes overcrowded dangerous and queues build up Flow and Safety are improved by making traffic slow down. When hospitals are overcrowded dangerous full of queues and understaffed we are ordered to speed up. Result? #BawaGarba #IsabelAmaro @djnicholl @DrGrumble
-
-
Replying to @doctorcaldwell @lynn_laidlaw and
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
Sure we've done this analogy before Gordon? If someone weaves through traffic at 200mph (reckless) & causes an inevitable fatal pile up, they're culpable despite any 'system' flaws around them. Ever wonder what our analogies sound like? Harsh but true ;-)https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/1023952713539891202 …
John Clarke added,
John Clarke @C7RKYReplying to @marionste @joannefishwick1 and 46 othersYou can walk right over the top of a drain cover every day and not suspect anything untoward exists underneath. But when somebody lifts the lid and shoves your head in there one day, you never get the smell of sh*t out of your nostrils ever again. Such is the NHS experience.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @doctorcaldwell and
That has intent. Something required in Scots law but not in English law for prosecuting medical negligence
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
A better scenario - someone weaves through traffic at 200mph, breaks don’t work, car is deficient, they attempt some preventative action although the speed makes the action less effective and still cause a pile up are their actions criminally reckless
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JFr4ser @doctorcaldwell and
I was going to reply with something along those lines, but you beat me to it. :) Key point for me is that it's possible to be personally grossly negligent in one's own actions, regardless of any exacerbating flaws around them. Which is what the courts decided.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @doctorcaldwell and
In Scotland without intent to do harm there wouldn’t be a prosecution for healthcare staff. There are long lists of medics who have been criminally convicted for their wilful & reckless behaviour. The medical community stands behind Dr BG for a reason
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes, self preservation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Janine00050361 @JFr4ser and
Yes, self-preservation to some extent. But that’s because it could have been me. We’ve all made mistakes that may or may not have killed people. I guess if you want us all in jail...
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HodkinsonAlice @Janine00050361 and
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
It could've been you? Why? Are you often killing patients by behaving in a 'truly, exceptionally bad', grossly negligent manner then? It's only criminals that risk going to jail and making a mistake is not criminal.
#BawaGarbahttps://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/1029303542685814789 …John Clarke added,
John Clarke @C7RKYReplying to @C7RKY @doctorcaldwell and 4 othersIt's become apparent that several people have had trouble accessing my reply to Gordon's letter, so here's a Dropbox version that may help solve the problem.#JackAdcock#BawaGarba#IsabelAmaro https://www.dropbox.com/s/ca70n2do7e4eyz3/Dear%20Gordon%20Letter.pdf?dl=0 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @Janine00050361 and
Bawa-Garba has been criminalised by poor common law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
More utter nonsense. She criminalised herself by her own acts/omissions. Unless you regard your own opinion of the law above that of the High Court, of course?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.