CQC 2016 deaths review says 232, 442 deaths a yr down2 NHS neglect & life shortening. we knw frm #Gosport, life shortening/premature deaths as early as 1980s, so clinical euthanasia by NHS in region of 4-10 million deaths either by CQC/Pullicino figures. TheFacts R in the Figures
-
-
The scope of the inquiry is being discussed this month , perhaps she will make a move before she can be charged ,Would be good to know what is going on.
-
I may be being naïve, but even if she moves, the police investigation won't stop. And if they find evidence to suspect her, they presumably issue an arrest warrant. So unless she heads for somewhere without an extradition treaty, I'm not sure it will help her. Let's see...
-
Hi
@C7RKY luving your posts - but 1 query; How do we know that the police are actually conducting a genuine "investigation"? I ask this because every time the#police (across 3 regions) informed me that they were "investigating" - it turns out they were fibbing#fraudsters ! -
Thanks Fiona. That's a v good question. Police are essentially a service provider & to trigger their 'service' you need only report a matter that if true, would be a criminal offence. Provided there's no evidence to the contrary, they must then register it & issue a crime ref no.
-
That crime ref no. is like confirmation that you are entitled to their service (a criminal investigation). No crime no, no investigation. That's the simple version. BUT, it does not guarantee you a criminal investigation of any substance and in my case, they just lied throughout.
-
'Crime ref.' indicates that a crime has been committed so, yes, you would be right in expecting some form of investigation (where possible) & follow-up. Nos. also allows claims to be processed elsewhere. Unfortunately, our 'liberal' mined police chiefs often have other ideas !
-
Well, it indicates that a crime is suspected. The investigation seeks to determine whether it's actually been committed or not and if guilt can be proven. But you don't need to tell me about their other ideas! I understand what you mean completely. >>
-
I've got one email from a CH Insp refusing to give me a crime ref no because he claims no crime has been committed & another letter from much later after I complained, suddenly quoting a crime ref no as the reason they couldn't investigate - because they claim they already have!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So the case is only proven until they realise high level players are involved... and then it becomes unproven? Right... I see.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Unbelievable. You'd think they'd never heard of the word blatant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.