I wish we talked more about setting & ENFORCING boundaries with MH professionals, rather than focusing on whether or not patients 'need' boundary setting.https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/1038763741297487872 …
That almost strikes me as akin to consent, setting the boundaries in advance. More a legal requirement, given the guidelines are entitled 'Consent to examination or treatment'. In that discipline, the conversation is the examination. And you can refuse all or part of that imho.
-
-
Did you see my recent thread on my non-consent to psych liaison in A&E resulting in my GP, crisis team being contacted b4 I even knew I was referred & my cmht contacted after I'd explicitly refused consent, followed by 2 A4pages to my GP? All without consent & not under section.
-
And I thought I was just attending urgent care centre to see a GP as local GP surgery advised me to cos they had no appointments for people visiting the area/temporary residents.
-
No! I didn't see that. Have you a link please? That sounds like just the kind of thing which will attract my disapproving attention. -
There's just everything wrong about that!! Failure to assess/treat physiological conditions in a timely fashion. And conducting a clinical examination not just without consent, but contrary to an explicit withholding of consent. It's at least a clin neg case & GMC referral, imho.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.