I think the mutual respect was already clear from our tweets over many years, but was unmistakeable in our exchange of letters. But we both enjoy a debate! In this instance though, I'm just pointing out a contradiction in 2 opposing positions - & both are Gordon's this time. 1/2
-
-
In the blue corner we have Gordon: "If we think that we've got all the info when we've only got 7 bits out of 10, we can't go right" + "Missing info means you cannot succeed at a task" VS in the red corner, Gordon: "I may not have the full facts, but I have more than enough"
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu
Depends which facts you have & their importance &which facts you don’t have. I am sure
#BawaGarba case will move on, everything will come out, then we shall know.@TeamHadiza have plenty of £s now to carry on so the truths can be declared more publicly. I admit I could be wrong1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
£s to carry on with what, I wonder? I firmly believe we should all get to see that transcript to know what the public is expected to have confidence in. Until such time, nobody can be sure of themselves, imho. Which is why all the support has appeared to be blind from the outside
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @doctorcaldwell and
A court transcript won't be comprehensive on an issue because all the participants will argue what they think is relevant to the court eg to manslaughter allegations. The Judge should prevent irrelevant stuff being aired. But that may actually be important for other purposes.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
We have the Serious Untoward Incident report which was not even allowed in Court! We have Dr Cusack’s interview made public (did he appear in court?) ... https://www.dropbox.com/s/07zrsx5nypav9fn/FOI.SUI%20REPORT%20FOI%20Redacted.pdf?dl=0 … Mtps Report https://www.dropbox.com/s/hiw24u36t1or5pa/Dr_Hadiza_BAWA-GARBA_13_June_2017.pdf?dl=0 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doctorcaldwell @C7RKY and
The censored SUI was made public only this year: who tried to get it admitted to the manslaughter trial? How do you know?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doctorcaldwell @C7RKY and
So Dr
#BawaGarba made no effort to get it into evidence? Given its content (even censored) she was wise. Court wants the best evidence available: anyone who said something useful in the SUI would front court and be up for cross-examination.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
She was ill advised & represented by her Defence Union legal advisers. The
@TeamHadiza crowd funding allowed her to get top notch legal team. The same happened with#DavidSellu I fear sometimes#MPS has not used best team. I believe#IsabelAmaro was even more poorly represented1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'd like to better understand her defence too - I'd want the kitchen sink throwing at the court in mitigation if it were me being charged. But I agree with Robert re the SUI report. Even redacted, it doesn't read well for BG. Leaving it out may have been perceived to be sensible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.