I ask for 35 mins of your time to Listen to my talk on #Misdiagnosis if you doubt my friend @DrUmeshPrabhu who speaks the truth (even if he is harsher on #BawaGarba than I would be)
Audio
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ztnw5nhyd8huuk8/Practical%20Steps%20Diagnosis.m4a?dl=0 …
Slides
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xhcn6dbt32g7rv4/Practical%20Solutions%20to%20Diagnostic%20Error.pptx?dl=0 …https://twitter.com/DrUmeshPrabhu/status/1037062208868499457 …
-
-
Replying to @doctorcaldwell
@C7RKY If there is one person I trust more as a honest sincere kind caring doctor then it is@doctorcaldwell I am sure you also respect him.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu @doctorcaldwell
I think the mutual respect was already clear from our tweets over many years, but was unmistakeable in our exchange of letters. But we both enjoy a debate! In this instance though, I'm just pointing out a contradiction in 2 opposing positions - & both are Gordon's this time. 1/2
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
In the blue corner we have Gordon: "If we think that we've got all the info when we've only got 7 bits out of 10, we can't go right" + "Missing info means you cannot succeed at a task" VS in the red corner, Gordon: "I may not have the full facts, but I have more than enough"
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu
Depends which facts you have & their importance &which facts you don’t have. I am sure
#BawaGarba case will move on, everything will come out, then we shall know.@TeamHadiza have plenty of £s now to carry on so the truths can be declared more publicly. I admit I could be wrong1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
£s to carry on with what, I wonder? I firmly believe we should all get to see that transcript to know what the public is expected to have confidence in. Until such time, nobody can be sure of themselves, imho. Which is why all the support has appeared to be blind from the outside
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Supreme Court? The transcript is of course an record of an investigation of records made of what actually happened. Sadly there is no video of the real events, which even then would be video from one angle. But the person missing on admission was the supervising Consultant
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Well, he may have been MIA on the day Jack died, (in more ways than one), but he wasn't missing at the trial. He was giving evidence. Evidence I'd like to be able to read. All of it. We don't know what the prosecution presented against her, or the defence presented in mitigation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe if we did, it would become obvious as to why the jury convicted her? Maybe even obvious as to why the judge refused her leave to appeal? I'm confused by how one can appeal conviction having been refused leave to do so tho. That's beyond my grasp of our legal system so far.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.