The Panorama piece didn't scratch the surface and I'm not left with the same 'balanced' feeling you obviously were. But the public aren't daft. We know what GNM is and whether or not we want a child of ours treating by a doctor convicted of it. Public confidence is the issue now.
Oh no, you too? I'm really going to have to get my IT act together if I'm going to start doing things like this. Don't suppose this PDF version works for you? I've had to resort to email earlier - which you're welcome to if this doesn't work. https://1drv.ms/b/s!Al9MeK9ofDhMph8an0I5r1mbfpSs …
-
-
t requires me to sign in to Microsoft and its a real bum ache.
-
Fair enough. Guess I'd better start getting my head around Dropbox then, eh?
-
Low and behold, I just found I already have it in my phone. Is this link any good?https://www.dropbox.com/s/ca70n2do7e4eyz3/Dear%20Gordon%20Letter.pdf?dl=0 …
-
Got it, ta. Will have a good read a bit later. I think these conversations are vital, but sadly they don't tend to go beyond a few people outside of medicine.
-
There are a growing number of us taking an interest. Sadly, for all the wrong reasons initially, but hey... we're here now. So let's fix some things, I say.
-
Amen to that.
-
Read your reply to
@doctorcaldwell. I find both letters interesting. There is a problem of cognitive dissonance from a Clapham bus perspective which is hard to dispell, but this is discrete issue in a complex web of systemic failure. -
There is an argument that had little Jack not died, but her errors were still made, at what level of negligence would they have been assessed? The perceived negligence is predicated by outcome and this is where all Drs feel the 'There but the grace' brush past their cheek.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.