Is that ‘failure’ deliberate, to cause harm? Or in itself due to inexperience and limited knowledge? The Dunning-Kruger effect, along with lack of awareness of importance of features or effects. That’s exactly why juniors must be appropriately supervised
I guess it would depend on what that infamous reasonable body of medical opinion felt about the care you provided to, and management plan you left in place for child A, before leaving to attend child B? But once deemed reasonable, you can't be in 2 places at once!
-
-
Practically, in that situation, you're hugely reliant on the rest of the team. I think I've been very lucky that I've worked with some excellent colleagues. But I think that's where the swiss cheese model comes in: reliant on all those other factors to provide care
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed, though letter of the law doesn’t care about child XY or Z if the case is only about child A. Is that realistic? Even if turns out other 3 children would have died if everything that experts say should have been done was done for Child A? Not a perfect world
-
That's not true in English common law eg manslaughter. "Impossibility" is a defence, the courts don't expect miracles. Dr BG would have to produce evidence eg saving others meant impossible to attend to Jack. She didn't claim that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.