When the M25 becomes overcrowded dangerous and queues build up Flow and Safety are improved by making traffic slow down. When hospitals are overcrowded dangerous full of queues and understaffed we are ordered to speed up. Result? #BawaGarba #IsabelAmaro @djnicholl @DrGrumble
-
-
Replying to @doctorcaldwell @lynn_laidlaw and
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
Sure we've done this analogy before Gordon? If someone weaves through traffic at 200mph (reckless) & causes an inevitable fatal pile up, they're culpable despite any 'system' flaws around them. Ever wonder what our analogies sound like? Harsh but true ;-)https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/1023952713539891202 …
John Clarke added,
John Clarke @C7RKYReplying to @marionste @joannefishwick1 and 46 othersYou can walk right over the top of a drain cover every day and not suspect anything untoward exists underneath. But when somebody lifts the lid and shoves your head in there one day, you never get the smell of sh*t out of your nostrils ever again. Such is the NHS experience.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @doctorcaldwell and
That has intent. Something required in Scots law but not in English law for prosecuting medical negligence
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
A better scenario - someone weaves through traffic at 200mph, breaks don’t work, car is deficient, they attempt some preventative action although the speed makes the action less effective and still cause a pile up are their actions criminally reckless
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JFr4ser @doctorcaldwell and
I was going to reply with something along those lines, but you beat me to it. :) Key point for me is that it's possible to be personally grossly negligent in one's own actions, regardless of any exacerbating flaws around them. Which is what the courts decided.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @doctorcaldwell and
In Scotland without intent to do harm there wouldn’t be a prosecution for healthcare staff. There are long lists of medics who have been criminally convicted for their wilful & reckless behaviour. The medical community stands behind Dr BG for a reason
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes, self preservation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Janine00050361 @C7RKY and
No. Intent. Take it out of healthcare and apply to all those within the criminal justice system. We place our belief in a fair judicial system and try to minimise any miscarriages if justice. Self-preservation applies to all of us under these circumstances
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JFr4ser @Janine00050361 and
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
It does apply to all of us, but not many groups pull together to try & force a law change to favour themselves as a result. Despite the furore surrounding this case, such prosecutions are so rare it can make current action appear self serving to we pts.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/1025684028530327557?s=21 …
John Clarke added,
John Clarke @C7RKYReplying to @C7RKY @dr_shibley>> Let's face it, 4 convictions against all HCPs in 5 years doesn't scream undue risk to me. Wouldn't even qualify for disclosure for consent purposes as a %, (prior to the Montgomery judgement., at least). https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/1011955197726347269 …2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
I do not blame any families who have told lies after the death of their loved ones. I am more keen to get rid of bad system bad leaders and make
#NHS safest and the best and most honest learning organisation get rid of bad staff@gmcuk @claremarx@TheBMA@MPS_Medical@MDDUS_News1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm guessing you mean families who have been told lies here, rather than families who have told lies? Or do you?
-
-
#doctors or managers or anyone who lies.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.