That's an interesting list - esp considering there appears to be complete non-compliance with those guidelines in this case. Have they any weight? Is it like GMC guidelines which one is obliged to account for?
-
-
No-one enforces guidelines They're guidelines, not laws nor regulationspic.twitter.com/gUqGBfyNTp
-
As well you know GMC can be harsh on those of our tinted brethren who do not follow the guidelines ' Guide o me my GMC I am weak but thou art mighty."
-
I'm of the view that whistleblowers and BME staff are disproportionately targeted in order to contain scandals & make the overall headline sanction figures look defensible. But there's a dark side to that coin. Clinicians from other groups are unreasonably protected by GMC.
-
That should've said *another* dark side...
-
Clinician's being protected by GMC is not a concept with which I am familiar
-
Yes.. I'm mindful of your own experience doc. I wish I weren't familiar with the concept, but I could share the details of our case and you'd perhaps better appreciate my point. Or the experiences of so many others I'd honestly struggle to estimate. Universally despised, the GMC.
-
DM anytime you want. Love the last sentence, serves no-one well
-
I may take you up on that one day if it's something that would be of interest to you? Can't be every day that somebody claims to have documentary evidence of a criminal assault I suppose. And if GMC won't act on such as that, then imagine what else they must 'overlook'.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.