If one falls foul of the system then ftp or any internal disciplinary procedure tends to run its course before any other matter is dealt with.
Once you are under review? Can you elaborate please? I expect the reported concern to come under review, not the person reporting it. So how does that switcheroo end up happening without clinical uproar? What are the actual mechanics of that process and how do we prevent it?
-
-
-
So they'll just sweep the original concern under the carpet and do nothing with it whilst they drag their feet and pursue the upstart who dared raise it? Wouldn't mind seeing the evidence for *that* evidence-based practise! How can they justify that? No precautionary principle??
-
One needs to have a hospital that is adequately staffed where the equipment works where staff in training are adequately supervised and investigations are performed in a timely manner and results acted upon to enable clinical decision making to be safely made
-
Of course. I'd expect to find nothing less in any competent healthcare system.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.