Jack died 7 years ago. There have been 7 years worth of opportunities in this case and others to address the system issues. Why this case, and why now? Could it be something to do with Dr BG losing her job?
-
-
But no such concern here? He swans off into the sunset unscathed, after first testifying against his junior. Blatant cover up by one of your own, but I see no mass call for action to hold him accountable. A regular event, but rarely so visible. 3/
-
All the action is instead about trying to allow a convicted criminal to continue being a doctor. And she is guilty w/o evidence to the contrary Gordon, no matter how many metaphors and analogies you offer us trying to suggest otherwise. 4/
-
This appeal is not going to alter her criminal conviction, even if successful and without access to that Crown Court transcript, none of us know what her 22 errors deemed 'truly exceptionally bad' really were.5/
-
Which can only mean that your support - and that of a seemingly unending supply of clinical commentators & financial supporters - must be blind, imho. How can it be anything else? It's not easy for me to understand. 6/6
-
We are all reasonable people but our narratives are different. It’s difficult to comprehend the effects of being a victim of medical error and the despair knowing it will happen to others. I realise that medics feel similar on behalf of colleagues.
-
Appreciated. V few GNM prosecutions of doctors to point at though (as compared to instances of patient harm, at least) do not sure how real that fear is. I agree about the differing narratives though. So true...https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/1022978427618570240?s=21 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.