Thank you - much appreciated. But I'm afraid that's the High Court appeal, rather than the original Crown Court trial. Is the other link you we're thinking of also for the appeal?
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @katemasters67 and
No I think it was for the original trial John. I remember being shocked at what I was reading, it covered the enalapril being given and the fact that Jack was haemorrhaging into his lungs. Will have another look.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @lynn_laidlaw @C7RKY and
That ruling is from the GMC case. The criminal court transcript has never been published. The SI report is somewhere on the internet, last saw it published by
@doctorcaldwell1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67 @C7RKY and
Thanks Kate. On reflection I can’t remember exactly what it was I read but it certainly provided much more medical detail than I had read before. I remember being very shocked at the amount of failings in Jacks care.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @lynn_laidlaw @katemasters67 and
For a number of doctors to be defending her actions, has me thinking that the is generally the level of acceptable practice & care. Why else would they be screaming "it could be me next"? We accept it as service users or die.
3 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Janine00050361 @lynn_laidlaw and
If the doctors tweeting
#iamhadiza truly believe they’d have acted the same, we are stuffed.5 replies 4 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67 @sarasiobhan and
Not really Kate. It's the circumstances that you need to look at not the individual. In that perfect storm of re-entry after a career break, major understaffing, lack of consultant support, etc many of us at that stage in our careers could have ended up in the same position.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @NHSwhistleblowr @katemasters67 and
I think we can all agree that the care given to Jack that day was “ truly, exceptionally bad “. Due to that a child lost their life and it’s the parents who have a life sentence. That’s got lost in all of this.
3 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @lynn_laidlaw @NHSwhistleblowr and
Hadiza was not responsible. If you and others wish to see a safer N.hS you'd all step back from thinking there was a rush to defend a colleague. No. There was a rush to defend a safer NHs for boys like Jack. Jack's care was abysmal due to the murderous conditions at the hospital
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VSTMMJJ @lynn_laidlaw and
If there was no direct link from her actions & jacks death there would be no GNM conviction.She is responsible, the courts have gone over the evidence & she was found guilty. You can keep telling yourself different but it's not reality.There's no denying there are problems in NHS
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
I'm really glad you replied - I think my response to this nonsense would've come across as far more curt. :)
-
-
It's a full time job you guys are doing that without it, there would be no balance. It's a pretty respectful debate
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.