"Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal probably repeated elsewhere"
If I've not made it clear enough in the past, then let me be clear now - @Jarmann is a star. A true patient champion who says what needs to be said. So grateful...https://www.itv.com/news/2018-06-21/gosport-war-memorial-hospital-opioid-scandal/ …
-
-
The patients didn't 'have their lives'shortened' - they weren't terminally ill. They had their lives unnecessarily stopped.
1 reply 4 retweets 5 likes -
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
Absolutely agree. That phrasing has bothered me from the outset. It's starting to feel like a tactic. An agreed approach to minimise the damage.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/1009407915931914242?s=21 …
John Clarke added,
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @daisypearldaisy and
💥M 💥 Retweeted The Secret Barrister
Hi John,
@BarristerSecret has an interesting and informative thread about that here in terms of terminology used to refer to this -https://twitter.com/BarristerSecret/status/1009699620774207488 …💥M 💥 added,
The Secret Barrister @BarristerSecretBecause “murder” is a legal term, requiring the specific intent to kill or cause really serious harm, as opposed to, say, gross negligence manslaughter or unlawful act manslaughter. And nobody has been charged with, much less convicted of, murder. [1/2] https://twitter.com/michaellcrick/status/1009555895058141185 …Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Hi Matt. Thanks, that's interesting. I'm keen to see how they read intent on this one. Personally, I think you start to lose plausible deniability once your actions have killed the first couple of dozen patients. After that, you can't pretend not to know what you're doing, imho.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.