No, but omitting disclosure that your spouse is a White House official is.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ask any lawyer.
-
Ask them what? That a quirky hobby doesn't fit in with the D.C. crowd? Are they not all about diversity. This is what diversity is guys. You can't have it both ways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Might be better to appoint an interesting - and qualified - person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
With all the qualified lawyers out there Trump picks this guy for a federal judgeship?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well done Byron, I wasn't sure how you would defend a nominee the bar association said was unfit for the bench, who has never tried a case, and who didn't reveal that his wife works for the White House council. But damn if you didn't find a way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Real life experience is a great plus. Does he have any?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope. But it is irresponsible to put an unqualified political hack on the bench. A judge is a referee. You don't want a ref who has not only never called a game, but also who has never played the game.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You are better than this Byron. Not only is he completely unqualified, his appointment is intended to silence his wife who is a potential witness in Mueller’s investigation. You are better than this,
@ByronYork.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are almost as big a trump shill as Hannity. The American Spectator was a good training ground.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hahahaha “interesting person” you are too much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its an egregious partisan attack against good governance. The man appears wholly unqualified and you would be screaming from the rooftops if a previous Dem administration tried anything similar.
#partisanhackThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow if this was the Dems, you’d be on Fox News going crazy! He’s not qualified and it was evident! Maybe one of Trump’s caddies should be a federal judge for life! This is stupid on your part!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Imagine a similiar “interesting” person was nominated by Obama.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on qualifications.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, Byron, that's what opposition to this appointment is grounded in - a firm belief that interesting people should not be judges.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.