I expect to see Mueller treat Tony Podesta the same way as Manafort. House raids by FBI, intense questioning, etc...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is stunning and connects a ton of dots. Where is DOJ and AG Sessions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Put simply, the level of intellectual gymnastics required by
@AndrewCMcCarthy to minimize all things Trump/Russia and the current indictments while seemingly maintaining the HRC email investigation involved crimes punishable by death is amusing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Mueller investigation is too compromised to continue apart from the fact it is beyond any mandate it was understood it had
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read the heavily redacted DOJ summaries of the Clinton so-called investigation. What was released should have ignited a scandal because the scandalous nature of what was done & not done was evident but the left wing media gave all concerned a pass.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Waiting for the DOJ IG to stop milking it. I've called it Pygmalion. Take anyone off the street, train him or her 6 months, and that person will tell you the server invest was a sham.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well this p$ssed me off first thing in the morning. I'm so sick of the politics first mentality .. it's now always politics first .. right and wrong can take a hike
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Personal integrity & service r the catalyst needed to produce honest unbiased prosecutions. Are they here or missing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did
@AndrewCMcCarthy read the court documents regarding the plea deal of Trump's "low level foreign policy volunteer"? He certainly lied about more than just the timing of his meeting with Russians. Why the obvious minimization? -
With the huge number of jurist being appointed by Trump, can we assume Andrew will apply the same standard when reviewing their decisions: who they advised and who appointed them? Apparently Andrews only criticism of Howell's opinion is he advised Leahy/appointed by Obama
-
Andrew believes Obama "interfered" with and "prejudiced" the Clinton investigation and that DOJ "subordinates" relied on Obama's "rationale" in not indicting HRC.
-
Does that same standard apply to Trump and his numerous statements about collusion and his actions directly aimed at impacting the investigation? Is it possible Trump's DOJ/FBI/IRS subordinates have been "interfered" with or "prejudiced"?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sigh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are 2 indictments and one guilty plea already -and these are FACTS!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He will seek impeachment since no collusion evidence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.