A campaign paying for opposition research has never before been considered controversial. Why is it controversial now?
-
-
-
Because a dossier that was fake news is "suddenly" connected to Clinton and that makes it real news.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bigger Question To force Clinton and DNC into the open, openly claiming payment, WHAT IS IN THOSE FUSION BANK RECORDS?
-
Payments from the original GOP donors from the primary, presumably.
-
I'm not sure that's it. Clinton would not be forced into the light to protect reputation of the Bush clan. It HAS TO BE bigger than that.
-
It's literally oppo-research. Even if the DNC/Clinton knew that Steele's contacts were Russian, right wingers defended Jr's meeting.
-
So, let's get everyone under oath and figure this out.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You mean it was first funded by GOP in the primary and then later by Democrats in the general, like we always knew?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who was the Republican who paid for it?
-
That’s the rumor
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.