IF it won't do any good (which it won't), then you should very much object to it.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then don’t limit what I can have, especially when I don’t misuse it or hurt anyone. Are you arguing for prior restraint on law abiding?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems to me a law that fails to dramatically change situation cannot implicate compelling govt interest and should fail strict scrutiny.
-
That said, I suspect proposal will be popular and is probably an easy sacrifice to the We Must Do Something mob.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On practical grounds, I agree. On constitutional grounds, I disagree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The real problem is all the illegal weapons in the inner cities yet leftist don’t seem to care about that.,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will never give an inch on
#2A. All that does is get The Left that much closer to the next inch/then the next. They want guns rounded up.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, if someone wants to protect his hearing, improve home defense capability, with a suppressor, you are OK with banning it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why suppressors? How are they implicated/involved?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.