He should ignore courts he within his rights let them fight in Supreme Court
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The political impact of the judiciary has been downplayed as if they are truly non-partisan.We clearly see they are partisan across the USA.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Deriliction of sworn duty. What is the point of a judicial system if a judge rules based on how he feels not our Constitution?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They are only supposed to rule on constitutionality of the order, activist judges at their best.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In other words, a decision based on political bias & not on the law or the constitution. Totally unacceptable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice deflection from Kushner trying to open back channels with Russia

-
Tweet unavailable
-
I doubt than any other transition team in history proposed a secret communication using a hostile foreign nations equipment
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump has historic opportunity 2 shape court since huge # of vacancies yet almost no nominees. Need them b4 midterms
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There not judges there politicians
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So much for equal justice for all. Imagine how judges could screw up Equal Protection even more, using this as "precedent."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems the decision itself, which makes plain its targeting one specific individual, is unconstitutional.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Will SCOTUS ever hear challenge to US v Wong Kim Ark? That travesty makes Travel Ban look small. It fits no standard of case law ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are in serious trouble when courts make decisions that violate the constitutional powers of the President. Its called fascism.
@cnnThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
these judges are taking the interpretation of the law way too far. If this were Obama they wouldn't be blocking it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Politics have NO PLACE in The Judicial Branch. Judges with a political slant, fired and replaced with those of integrity and honor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.