What is the appropriate ratio of negative coverage for a president who lights his own hair on fire every 36 hours or so?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This needs to be corrected. How can it be fixed without trampling on the freedom of the press?
-
Press properly reporting negative news, shouldn't sanitize. But didn't properly cover Trump *before* the election, only HER EMAILS 24/7
-
She actually had classified information on her private server. Trump did not actually collude with Russia, and there's no evidence for it.
-
The investigation is ONGOING. They haven't presented their evidence to any of us yet. Numerous Benghazi hearings and probes into emails find
-
no prosecutable evidence, but you deem her behavior criminal. Meanwhile, you won't even wait for the end of the current look at Trump.
-
Is it illegal to have classified information on a private server. That is a crime. Comey chose not to go forward. Meeting on a tarmac influ
-
Trump is the current President. Things Hillary did or didn't do are irrelevant in the calculation of whether to investigate the extremely
-
Based on recent behavior from the left, I am certain they are looking to "plant" evidence against Trump.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
People are abandoning negative
#fakemedia. Hit them in the pocketbook...tank thieir ratings. Demand factual, true coverage.#AbortMedia !Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most don't. He thoroughly deserves his awful press and you do yourselves no favours pretending otherwise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1st - Treatment of Hillary much worse. 2nd - Trump has some real legal issues that are self-inflicted as opposed to stupid emails.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Because trump was many times more stupid, arrogant and ineffective. Positive actions or words would have been reported also.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People are 'angry at idea there is appropriately negative level of press..." Who is angry? Trump voters? Why are they angry? Poor writing.
-
Because in some places 3-4 Trump voters have to share a single
@nyt reporter to express their continued support. Voices, brutally squashed. -
Ah I see your point. But Byron's point still eludes me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The media wanted to pick our president and it was obvious.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.