Isn't argument that uproar -- deserved or not -- influenced election, not substance of emails?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JohnJHarwood It was the coverage, rather than the substance, of the emails. It sowed confusion, just as the Russians hoped.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or maybe, HRC was a really crappy candidate, had a seizure and forgot to go to Wisconsin.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Pant suit Granny lost the presidency to him. What does that say about Grandma Hilldog?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Poor old gal forgot about the electoral college. Poor thing won't hold up to 2020.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unfortunately, that's not how that works.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Several states were determined by less than 1%. Argument can be made any/everything influenced the election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seth Rich source of DNC leaks not, Russia, murdered in a huge coverup by Clintons/DNC/Obama admin FBI never inspected DNC computers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your conclusion once again reveals your bias reporting. Their emails showed collusion between MSM, DNC and HRC!
-
My apologies Byron York. My remarks were not about your reporting; they were directed at John Harwood. Your reporting is fair, balanced.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
York is ignoring that this was part of a much larger influence campaign; get off the Trump train
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Office politicking emails don't swing an election. Fact is that if there were no emails to hack, there wouldn't be hacked emails. Blame HRC.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.