They don't care about law.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But let's break it down on merits, for a learned journalist like yourself. Challenge is on Constitutional grounds. 1/3
-
And on those grounds, the statute (as modified, which you and
@POTUS ignore) is irrelevant. Constitution, um, trumps US Code. 2/3 -
The constitution only trumps US code after it is ruled on to the highest court the opposing counsel will take it
-
That POV by leaders - "we're only constrained by Constitution to the extent Courts say so" - is authoritarian.
-
No. It's the way the constitution works. We vote in reps. Our reps pass law. We don't like law. We sue.
-
Nope. Every single elected official has obligation to abide by Constitution. On their own. Without being told to.
-
There is this issue with interpretation, which is why there is a SCOTUS, per the constitution.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@glennyork The 9th Circus apparently can't read the law if it goes against their globalist plansThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just write a new EO, by pass 9th Circ as 80% R overturned, time to abolish 9th for good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are not so many judges now violating their oath of office by not upholding the constitution/laws? Time to IMPEACH & LOCK THEM UP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
9th Circ thumbed nose at Constitution, the law & did left-wing politics.
@POTUS protects USA;Court protects terrorist - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Since opinion is procedural and allowing case to proceed to merits - not remarkable. Not as remarkable as you going full shill.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
not really b/c WA didn't argue there was no statutory authority for ban - WA said authority was exercised unconstitutionally
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neither the Constitution nor long established law matters to the 9th Circus.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Putting the Christian religion abover other religions. A violation of first amendment
-
didn't put any religion over another where in EO does it state that?
-
it stated Christians would be allowed entry first before other religions.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.