"arguably"? From a constructionist perspective, is it even close?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Believe what you want to believe, dude.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Arguably? And isn't that exactly what is happening?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and
@SCOTUSNGorsuch missed huge opportunity to explain Judges' role. He shouldn't say judges are beyond reproach after Robart rulThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You forgot to say "Soros connected WA State judge".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On Soros payroll.Loves BLM Pro-bono work for rapugees
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@swargcoming so what he is a judge who should have to run for political office. Especially since he can't read constitution!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you know he's not a state judge, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.