Huh? You shouldn’t even consider a ban before the evidence is clear.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You realize that these lawyers may think their case is crap, right?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn't you have evidence of possible threat before writing the EO?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
very poor.. DOJ let Trump down. Where are career DOJ
-
Updating their resumes.
-
good. Drain the swamp
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
DOJ is making a terrible argument; Flentje is terrible. They might lose a case they shouldn't be able to lose. Incredible.
-
it's the 9th Circuit. Not a court open to this argument or policy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@whpresscorps President has plenary power is the answer to every question. No "threat" required. -
and foreign nationals not in country have NO rights under COTUS.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@eastiestrong I liked the judge's point that they were the ones who rushed it, so... -
that's probably what
@realDonaldTrump says to his mistresses, sorry, I rushed it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
grossly unprepared. Amateur hour
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like its time to drain the swamp at the DOJ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so people want judges to make decisions about our national security! Are judges privy to the daily NS briefly?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why in general there is no appeal from a TRO; need to wait for an injunction hrg to develop evidence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.