I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
-
-
-
I hear U. I wondered this morning if I actually died & ended up in hell because it must be a place of total insanity.
-
To put national security at risk for this theatre is ridiculous.
-
It is incomprehensible that anyone can argue that economic concerns supersede national security.
-
Or perception of moral authority and high ground. Just completely absurd.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Legislating from the bench, making policy. So called judge was correct description.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah well there were no terror related arrests of Saudi citizens on American soil before 9/11 either. How ignorant R our judges?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. (Not that I'd expect a judge to understand).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if there HAD been terror-related arrests from those 7 countries, would the EO have been constitutional?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ninth Circuit is going to say same thing, because they won't be ruling on lawfulness, but harm.
-
That makes no sense. Shouldn't they be ruling on weather it is constitutional or not? What is wrong with the 9th circuit?
-
Admin could win on the merits.
@ByronYork -
Tweet unavailable
-
harm vs. threat is only thing to be determined on lift order.
@Moosemacman19@ByronYork -
Tweet unavailable
-
no, as Justice O'connor said, the executive does not get a blank check.
@Moosemacman19@ByronYork - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@LilMissRightie That's irrelevant. It's the judge's job to interpret law not determine the merits of policy. He failed to do this - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.