Intent isn't even part of the statute. Ridiculous.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I'm gonna be suspicious if Comey gets a big advance from Hillary's publisher or lucrative position w/a Clinton friend/associate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This just proves Hillary has "institutional immunity!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did FBI need to ask about intent. They are going after Clinton Foundation and they already knew intent. Bigger fish than Hillary?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
oh, I'm sure she would have answered honestly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But Comey even said one doesn't need to show intent so why did he then say they couldn't prove it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So what? He questions decision of FBI! Gowdy a loser! Judicial watch has uncovered more emails that his committee! Congress weak!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
good observation on gowdy's part
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2-6 years extra of investigation and committees will be a worthwhile use of public funds! This will never end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#CrookedHillary commits high TREASONThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think investigator would infer intent. Why would an investigator ask what the intent was? Answer would be next to useless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.