Wasn't it a pro-Cruz ad that the non-pro-Cruz SuperPAC ran in UT? So the non-pro-Cruz SuperPAC was pro-Cruz in UT, no? Or is that wrong?
-
-
@ByronYork@jimantle Right to Rise went hard after Rubio, which helped Cruz. Does that make R2R a "Pro-Cruz SuperPAC?" -
@BDenbrough The ad specifically advocated voting for Cruz. Surely you see a difference. -
@ByronYork@BDenbrough Byron, you are bring dishonest
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork That was definitely a pro-Cruz ad in UT. But a pro-Cruz PAC would want Cruz at 1237, not just to keep Trump from 1237. IMO. -
@jimantle Don't know their intent. Could just call them 'SuperPAC running pro-Cruz ad.' -
@ByronYork@jimantle let's not try to describe any kind of ethical code to the scum operatives, shall we?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork@jimantle they may not have registered as Pro Cruz but the ad was Pro CruzThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@jimantle would be different from saying a Cruz SuperPac. Words mean something & media reports allude to Cruz directing PACThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork Depends on whether they actually do urge votes for Kasich when he is the candidate best positioned to deny Trump delegates.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.