.@ByronYork
>> Figgas over Niggas <<
This pending trademark seeks to cover a line of “Apparel for dancers, namely, http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/18/12-trademarks-declared-less-offensive-than-redskins/#ixzz35TDPT4WA …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork i have yet to hear someone explain why Cleveland Browns is ok if redskins isn'tThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork the two are comparable how? You're comparing a racist name to a word identifying the gender of a dog.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork Does seem to raise some 1st Amendment/censorship issues. What entitles USG to be ultimate arbiter of this?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Between Jarrett's & this
#WarOnWomen? "@ByronYork Link:Patent Office quandary: No to 'Redskins,'yes to 'Crazy Bitch'? http://ow.ly/yl0oFThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork#Fruitloops is considering a rebrandingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork If the name needs to be representative of DC change it to the foreskins.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@byronyork the football team from New england should start to worryThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.