@ThePlumLineGS No, it's not. Who runs the Department of Homeland Security? ICE?
-
-
Replying to @ByronYork
@ByronYork GOP critique is Obama setting enforcement priorities. By embracing reform they can establish what they think priorities should be1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS You're assuming they trust Obama to enforce GOP enforcement priorities. They don't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ByronYork
@ByronYork Byron, is there any set of enforcement conditions/metrics under which Rs would embrace legalization for the 11 million?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Obviously some Rs already do. But for many, would require evidence of multi-year heightened enforcement first.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ByronYork
@ByronYork They support idea in principle. But is there any concrete proposal for legalization, packaged with real triggers, they'd support?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS This dilemma has not changed since Day One. http://ow.ly/wkahE1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ByronYork
@ByronYork Agreed. Case I'm trying to make is Rs have boxed themselves into a place where only acceptable policy is maximum deportations2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Well, border enforcement is not deportation (no matter how administration counts it).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ByronYork
@ByronYork Right. The GOP objection to Obama has now become that he's not deporting enough people who have lives here.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ThePlumLineGS Also, true visa entry-exit system enforcement would be good, shouldn't depend on comprehensive reform...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.