@ByronYork And I take no issue with Byron, Sarah Kliff or anyone else asking HHS.
-
-
-
@DemFromCT Think Laszewski's point is that these are knowable numbers. Could be known next week if administration wanted to know... -
@ByronYork I certainly support asking those Q. he says it’s easier than it actually is. LAT est is 9.5 mm, guessing more based on > 6mm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork contrast with LA Times for numbers http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obamacare-uninsured-national-20140331,0,5472960.story?page=1#axzz2xYDV8HQV … Bob makes no bones that he dislikes ACA and always has.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork For progressives yes, they've been wanting to destroy private health care for decades.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork What # of the uninsureds now being covered are attributed to Medicaid (which could've been done w/o ACA)?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork Depends what the goal. Was the goal for Dems to collapse existing healthcare doing away w/free mkts & govt provided only choice?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
spoiler: NO. (Mr. Laszewski is way too polite and professional to say it) MT
@ByronYork 'Was Obamacare Worth It?' http://ow.ly/vdekpThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork I think he lowballs#s but the Q that Bob Laszewski asks are legit ones. We’d all like answers to them, and eventually we will.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.