Do you know if the 5.0% was based on a shrinking workforce or not? I don't think anyone thought that 92 million would be out @ByronYork
-
-
-
@clantro As I understand it, workforce participation was expected to decline, but at much smaller rate, with Boomer retirements…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork I'm still waiting for you to tweet about Chris Christie! Fair and balanced??? You're a joke... -
@sldewey Tweeted about Christie at some length Wed/ Fri/Sat. Discussed on Fox Wed and Fri. Writing about Obamacare and jobs. No apologies. -
@ByronYork I've gone back thru your tweets concerning Christie... You just 'retweeted' stuff. Where's your opinion? Cat got your tongue?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork And what would unemployment be without the stimulus? And without federal and state austerity? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork that estimate naively underestimated the tea party wave of governors' enthusiasm for cutting public jobs in a recessionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@byronyork Byron, they lie so much about unemployed that they can't even get the % rate correct.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ByronYork Given that unemployment rate is now based on extent economy is hemorrhaging workers, might not be too long before we see 5%.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.