@ByronYork Good piece.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But I agree that he's not in the fore of the 2016 conversation. Partly due to views on gay rights? Surprised
@ByronYork didn't mention that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"One who spoke at far greater length about the economy and national security than about social issues."
@ByronYorkThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork has it right: "Anyone who watched [Santorum's] campaign ... saw a candidate with a wide-ranging agenda." http://ow.ly/nHUIiThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@AM_Hoffman With all due respect, I believe@AriFleischer report to@GOP was most cogent analysis.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@Shawn_Mize My guess os no. They will stick w/K Street consultants and lose again. Going the way of the Whigs.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork Where is this cogent analysis? I must see it. W/o "we are milquetoasts who refuse to confront media enemy" it's worthlessThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rick Santorum is not flashy just steady and steady is always a hard sell
@ByronYorkThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork in short ...No they won'tThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.