@ByronYork @SalenaZitoTrib @washingtonpost Those without coverage will probably be better off than those with coverage.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib@washingtonpost Obamacare was a taking over of an industry by Obama the federal government, not healthcare!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@salenazitotrib@washingtonpost Remember when the whole rationale was "2 cover the 30mil uninsured?" So it's a 100% miss of goal?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib@washingtonpost How about that, 30 million is the same number Obamacare was supposed to cover.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib@washingtonpost the next call will be single payerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib C'mon: do you have a suggestion for covering those people, Byron? Support a Dutch or Israeli system maybe? Lol -
@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib Let me know when conservatives remotely care about universal health ins., the kind of coverage you and I have -
@yeselson@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib Let me know when those who've inflicted#Obamacare on us will have#Obamacare inflicted on them. -
@MarcHoover1 get your insurance from your employer? You still will.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ByronYork@SalenaZitoTrib@washingtonpost Yeah, the original 2,000-page bill/law wasn't comprehensive enough.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.